Computer architectures for protection of personal informatic property: Putting pirates, pigs and rapists in perspective
AbstractPropertarian philosophy has so far focused on protecting that which we produce for others, perhaps for a price. It has failed to protect that which we may have no intention to give to others at any price. The former is well known as Intellectual Property (IP), while the latter is something I call Humanistic Property (HP). In the Goffman sense, IP is that which we "give" throught intentional creative action (e.g. the fruit of our labour), while HP is that which we "give off" (our "heart and soul") simply by being human. Analogous to the visceral, and obviously exaggerated metaphor of the Pirate (one who takes that which is meant to be given but merely denies profit), I put forth a metaphor for what I argue to be those committing a far greater transgression: Pigs, being those who steal HP. Furthermore, I include a third class, which I call Rapists, as being those who inseminate us with unwated informatic material. I argue that it is mainly the Pigs and Rapists we should be focusing our technical and leglislative efforts at controlling, rather than the Pirates.
How to Cite
Mann, S. (2000). Computer architectures for protection of personal informatic property: Putting pirates, pigs and rapists in perspective. First Monday, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v5i7.774
Authors retain copyright to their work published in First Monday. Please see the footer of each article for details.