Impact of Visual Scientific Data on Comprehension and Perception of Educational Animations for Biomedical Researchers

Open_Access_logo.jpg

Abstract Due to the rapid evolution of biomedical research, it is crucial to effectively communicate new technological advances in topics such as organoid models in cancer therapeutics to help improve health outcomes. Visual communication, including animation, has been shown to improve cognition and understanding of complex biological processes. However, there is contradictory information about the amount of detail that should be used for effective communication when utilizing animation.

 

Although it is known that the inclusion of detailed references increases the scientific community's perceived credibility of the visualization, the effect of including visual scientific data is unknown. This research examines the impact of including visual scientific data in an educational animation by analyzing biomedical researchers' perception of credibility and learning outcomes with respect to cancer organoid research.




To view a high resolution PDF of this poster, select the above image or this "PDF" link.

 
Vesalius Trust logo


This Vesalius Trust research poster was presented at the 2019 Association of Medical Illustrators' Annual Meeting held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This poster was awarded an Honorable Mention in the Vesalius Trust's research poster competition.

 


 

References


1. Alley, M. (2003). The craft of scientific presentations: critical steps to succeed and critical errors to avoid. New York: Springer.

 

2. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. The American Psychologist, 63(8), 760-769.

 

3. Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning. Educ Psychol Rev (Vol. 14).

 

4. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.

 

5. Borkin, M. A. (2013). What Makes a Visualization Memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2306-2315.

 

6. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225-244.

 

7. Hirsh, K., & McConathy, D. A. (1986). Picture preferences of thoracic surgeons. The Journal of Biocommunication, 13(1), 26-30.

 

8. Jenkinson, J., & McGill, G. (2012). Visualizing Protein Interactions and Dynamics: Evolving a Visual Language for Molecular Animation. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 103-110.

 

9. Jenkinson. (2013). Using 3D Animation in Biology Education: Examining the Effects of Visual Complexity in the Representation of Dynamic Molecular Events. The Journal of Biocommunication, 39(2), 42–49.

 

10. Wilson-Pauwels (2007). Biomedical communications: collaborative research in scientific visualization, online learning, and knowledge translation. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 81(3), 455–459.

 

11. Zoeckler, V. (2018). Exploring Animation Styles to Communicate the Effects of Exercise on the Gut Microbiota.

 

12. Jantzen, S. G. (2015). Transparency in film: increasing credibility of scientific animation using citation. Nature Methods, 12(4), 293–297.

 

13. Little, M. H. (2017). Organoids: a Special Issue. Development (Cambridge, England). England.

 

14. Aboulkheyr Es. (2018). Personalized Cancer Medicine: An Organoid Approach. Trends in Biotechnology, 36(4), 358–371.

 

15. Romero Calvo, I. (2019). Human organoids share structural and genetic features with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 17(1):70-83.

 

16. Sato, T. (2009). Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature, 459(7244), 262–265.

 

17. Verissimo, C. S. (2016). Targeting mutant RAS in patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids by combinatorial drug screening. ELife, 5, e18489.




Licensing


1. The authors have chosen to license this content under a Creative Commons Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Biocommunication